- Bilderberg (1428)
- Free Palestine (613)
- FreeNet Project (45)
- Gay Marriage (3780)
- Gaza Strip (1419)
- Israel Apartheid Week (159)
- Israel Crimes Against Humanity (112)
- Israeli Apartheid (458)
- Left Wing (1077)
- Liberal Views (284)
- Max Blumenthal (172)
- Max Keiser (1589)
- No Nato (403)
- Occupation Pictures (2105)
- Occupation Supporters (5)
- Occupied West Bank (379)
- Occupy Bilderberg (126)
- Occupy Boston (550)
- Occupy Canada (1)
- Occupy Canary Whalf (1)
- Occupy Cardiff (185)
- Occupy Detroit (390)
- Occupy Europe (116)
- Occupy Florida (501)
- Occupy Fort Lauderdale (47)
- Occupy France (296)
- Occupy Greece (306)
- Occupy Houston (382)
- Occupy Inverness (8)
- Occupy LA (1087)
- Occupy Lisbon (176)
- Occupy London (516)
- Occupy London Stock Exchange (311)
- Occupy Madrid (243)
- Occupy Miami (347)
- Occupy News (6)
- Occupy Oakland (698)
- Occupy Rome (251)
- Occupy Wall Street (433)
- Stop Globalization (265)
- West Bank (2577)
ShoutBoxLast Message2 months, 3 weeksago
- guest167358 : immune system boosters truly excellent web page immune system boosters «link» .
- coupon : true nutrition discount code «link» coupon code
- discount : very terrific site «link» true nutrition coupon code ..
- download : very remarkable website «link» free music downloads .
- Pakista : pakistan
- Guest_4834 : pakistan
- true nutrition : awesome «link» protein discount code
- free : highest quality «link» free music.
- web design : great «link» website is here
- gratis : neat «link» descargar ares gratis.
- gratis : extraordinary «link» descargar ares gratis.
- free : quite fine page «link» free music downloads ...
- me1341 : definitely outstanding blog «link» ...
- timmy : why does captalism trample the weak. «link»
- fun : «link»
- dem6 : take the power back «link»
- hardskin : Left power - get the right wing scum !
- coupon : very remarkable web page «link» true nutrition coupon
- twosons : nice site. «link»
- download : really good website «link» convertxtodvd free download key
- y : «link»
- whey : quite awesome information site «link» whey protein
- convertxtodvd : quite good site «link» convertxtodvd
- mujeres : genuinely great blog «link» mujeres
- Cassi : honestly really good internet page «link» true nutrition discount code save
- mujer : absolutely fine resource site «link» mujer busca hombre en toluca
- casada : very impressive resource site «link» mujer busca hombre df
- Wiltshire : very wonderful site «link» mujeres buscando hombre en df
- best : absolutely terrific blog «link» best type of protein powder
- mujer busca : truly awesome blog «link» mujer busca hombre en df
- hombre : Here «link» mujer busco hombre df
- types protein : «link» types of whey protein powder
- coupon : «link» true protein discount code
- seokatalog : hello there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical issues using this website, since I experienced to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. An
- seokatalog : Hey, is this website on joomla?
- Loading ...
Tag Archives: november
SEASIDE, Ore. (AP) – Young Republican activists implored their party to support gay marriage Saturday, saying the GOP is destined to continue losing elections in Oregon if it doesnt get behind an issue thats gaining traction around the country.
Hoping to claw their way back to relevance, Republican activists and elected officials gathered at their annual three-day Dorchester Conference in Seaside to debate issues that divide the party. Gay marriage took center stage. Two lawsuits have been filed seeking to invalidate Oregons decade-old ban on same-sex marriage, and gay-rights activists say they have enough signatures to put a marriage question on the November ballot.
The activists voted 233-162 to support the gay-marriage initiative.
I believe this is a wedge issue that drives young people to the Democratic Party, and then they learn the rest of the Democratic agenda, said Jacob Vandever of Corvallis, who is running for a seat in the state House.
Conservatives have long argued that the government should stay out of peoples personal lives, and many activists said the logic should extend to gay marriage.
The government should get out of the business of telling me who I can love and who I should marry, said Kirk Maag, a gay Republican from Portland.
Others disagreed, saying nobody should abandon their own principles for the sake of the party. Some said even having the debate played into the hands of Democrats, who stand to benefit from a divided Republican Party.
If you continue to shake your fist in the face of the living God, youre in trouble, said Charles Starr, a former longtime legislator.
The GOP is struggling nationally to find its identity, and Oregon is no exception. As hundreds from the partys establishment and activist corps gathered at Dorchester, conservatives held a competing rally in Clackamas County to flex their muscles.
The Dorchester Conference began in 1965 when Bob Packwood, then a state representative, organized a meeting for Oregon Republicans to discuss the future of the party at Dorchester House in Lincoln City. It has grown into a tradition for Republican activists and a chance for them to meet elected officials and party officials. Packwood went on to defeat Democratic U.S. Sen. Wayne Morse in 1968 and stayed in the Senate for nearly 30 years.
View original post here:
OAKLAND — Mayor Jean Quan pledged Thursday night to make Oakland streets safer and ensure that all residents benefit from a rebounding economy. In her final State of the City address before facing voters in November, Quan said Oakland was making strides against crime and presented her administration as the architect of the city’s post-recession economic turnaround. “The last few years I said we were rising,” Quan said
See the original post here:
INDIANAPOLIS The push to ban gay marriage in the Indiana Constitution passed the Indiana Senate 32-17 Monday, but opponents still claimed victory in delaying a public vote on the measure until 2016.
We can finally breathe a collective sigh of relief that lawmakers are finished with the amendment this session, and it will not appear on the ballot this November, said Megan Robertson, campaign manager for the coalition Freedom Indiana.
We were underdogs in this fight from the outset, but our success reflects the strength of the incredible coalition we were able to build in just six months. Every Hoosier who made a phone call, wrote a letter, sent an email, showed up at the Statehouse or helped oppose HJR3 in another way should be proud today.
Five Republicans voted against the proposal, and all northeast Indiana senators supported the measure.
House Joint Resolution 3 defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Indiana law already says that, but some believed constitutional protection was needed.
The House earlier this session removed the second sentence banning anything substantially similar to marriage, including civil unions.
If the language had remained, Hoosiers could have voted on the measure in November.
But now the process to amend the Constitution restarts requiring another separately elected legislature to approve the same language in 2015 before a public vote in 2016.
Nothing the state does can stop a federal judge from deciding gay marriage bans violate the U.S. Constitution.
Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, sponsor of the resolution, said the Senate has approved the language in varying forms six times.
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) Opponents of same-sex marriage have spent more than a decade working to ensure that Indiana stayed true to its conservative roots by strengthening its stance against gay unions. But in a year that was expected to bring a crucial victory, they find themselves facing a strong headwind.
Federal courts have overturned gay marriage bans in Oklahoma and Utah and the state Supreme Court did so in New Mexico. Nineteen states now allow gay marriage or civil unions.
Even in Indiana, support for a proposed amendment that would insert the state’s ban on gay marriage into the constitution is wavering amid concerns about its impact on businesses’ ability to attract top workers and offer domestic partner benefits.
Impassioned supporters of the ban aren’t daunted. For them, the issue isn’t about business needs or discrimination. It’s about faith and values that they say would be compromised if Indiana doesn’t take the extra step to ensure marriage can be between only a man and a woman.
“I believe we need to reinforce marriage and define marriage … or we are going to open up through sexual anarchy all types of confusion in our country, especially with what’s happening with our young people,” Ron Johnson, executive of the Indiana Pastors Alliance, told a House committee during a recent hearing on the amendment.
Indiana has long been a champion of conservative causes, from right-to-work legislation to restrictions on abortion. Lawmakers launched the nation’s broadest school voucher program and have cracked down on illegal immigration in recent years. But it lacks the reputation as a hotbed of social or religious conservatism that other, mostly southern, states have.
Only 46 percent of Indiana residents considered themselves “very religious” in a Gallup report published at the start of the month, said Gallup Polls editor in chief Frank Newport. That’s lower than Mississippi’s 61 percent and well above Vermont’s 22 percent, the lowest in the nation. The national average was about 41 percent.
Indiana’s status in the middle of the pack could be compounding the fight over the gay marriage amendment, which passed with broad bipartisan support in 2011 but must pass again this year to be placed on the November ballot.
Recent polls have shown increasing numbers of Indiana voters oppose a constitutional ban, even though most still oppose gay marriage. And even lawmakers who supported the ban in 2011 are questioning whether it would be better to let the issue die instead of putting the state in what’s likely to become a protracted legal battle. Activists on both sides of the issue say the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately will decide the issue for Indiana and other states.
“When I cast this vote to support this measure in 2011 it was one of the easiest votes I ever cast,” said Rep. Kevin Mahan, R-Hartford City. “I believe in marriage between one man and one woman and my constituents overwhelmingly did as well.”
Read the original here:
INDIANAPOLIS The Indiana House of Representatives voted 57-40 on Tuesday in support of House Joint Resolution 3 which aims to constitutionally ban gay marriage in the state.
Although gay marriage is already not recognized in Indiana, the addition of this amendment to the state’s constitution could potentially make marriage equality more difficult in the future.
The vote in support of HJR 3 came just one day after a bipartisan vote by Representatives of 52-43 to remove a sentence addressing civil unions from this amendment. As it was passed by the House, the amendment reads, Only a marriage between one (1) man and one (1) woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana.
The second sentence of this amendment, which was removed by the House vote, read, A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized. This sentence applies to civil unions and similar arrangements.
Rep. Eric Turner, R-Cicero, who authored the amendment, believes it should have been voted on as it was originally drafted. He told the Associated Press, I believe the HJR 3, as written, is the right public policy for the state of Indiana. The second sentence simply prevents marriage by any other name.”
Rep. Tom Dermody, R-La Porte, voted in favor of HJR 3 and against Monday’s vote to remove the second sentence.
As the vote now moves to the State Senate, however, the sentence could be added back in before the public has a chance to vote on the issue.
The process to amend the state constitution requires that the resolution be approved in back-to-back sessions of the General Assembly before it can be voted on by the public. This means that the earliest the issues could be presented to Indiana voters would be during the November 2016 election.
Consider that the measure still must pass through the mysterious ways of the Indiana Senate. Just as the second sentence was removed in the Indiana House, it certainly can be put back into HJR 3 by our state senators, which means we will be right back at square one on this issue, Pelath said.
But even if the Senate finds favor with the will expressed on Monday by a bipartisan group of House members, there remains one inescapable fact. This disturbing and nationally embarrassing debate will continue to consume our energies, he said.
Read this article:
The Mayor of London, who campaigned for election on the promise of keeping ticket offices open, now plans to close them as part of the 12.5% cut in the budget of London Underground (LU) announced on 21 November. The intention of London Underground is to create a self-service, supermarket model, and that means all Ticket Officesare due to close by 2015
See the rest here:
Nov. 5: Bank Transfer Day Nov. 5: Bank Transfer Day Tomorrow, November 5th has been dubbed, Bank Transfer Day
Go here to see the original:
With HJR3, the gay marriage amend-ment, moving toward Republican super-majorities in the House and Senate of the Indiana General Assembly, the likelihood of the measure going before Indiana voters in November has increased substantially.
Both sides say they can win, citing recent polls. Every poll, however, has its bias. Ask someone if theyre against abortion, and theyll probably answer yes. Ask the same person if theyre in favor of criminal penalties against women who seek abortions and against doctors who provide them, and the percentage of yes answers drops precipitously.
Democrats tend to be against the measure, while Republicans, who form a seemingly permanent majority in this state, are showing signs of division.
This week, Howard County Republican Party Chairman Craig Dunn had an insightful column for Howey Politics Indiana, revisiting the history behind the evolution of HJR3. (Read it here: http://bit.ly/LZzvZf)
The idea that state Republicans created a monster (Dunn more politely calls it a tiger) back in 2010, by using marriage and abortion to mobilize social conservatives, has more than a bit of truth to it. Then-House minority leader Brian Bosma repeatedly criticized former House Speaker Pat Bauer for refusing to give the gay marriage amendment a hearing.
Bauers refusal to hear the bill didnt save then-State Rep. Ron Herrell from a heavy defeat, and the next year, Bosma quickly passed the resolution, with quite a few Democrats voting in favor of it.
Once and for all
Politics turn on a pendulum, and the tide has certainly started to swing back toward opponents of HJR3, but will it turn quickly enough?
Gov. Mike Pence wants the debate settled once and for all, but thats only likely to happen if HJR3 is defeated. If it fails to make the November ballot, state Republicans, who had a hard time even getting it out of committee, would be unlikely to resurrect it.
If it passes, and Indiana becomes the 30th state to ban same-sex marriage in its constitution, opponents of the measure are unlikely to sit idly by as more and more states around Indiana allow gay marriage.
See original here:
INDIANAPOLIS Nine Republicans moved a proposed constitutional gay marriage ban out of committee Wednesday night setting up a much-anticipated full House vote on the measure next week.
All three Democrats on the House Elections Committee voted no, including Rep. Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne.
Rep. Casey Cox, R-Fort Wayne, voted yes but said he is reserving his right to vote against the measure later if a contentious second sentence isnt removed.
The initial passage came after a political maneuver by House Speaker Brian Bosma to shift it to the elections panel, which saved the proposal from defeat.
It was originally heard in the Judiciary Committee last week but stalled when leaders realized several Republicans might vote no.
The legislature first approved the proposed amendment in 2011. If it passes this year, then voters would get final say on the November ballot.
Much of the testimony during the four-hour hearing was like that from last week, though there were a few new speakers.
I am a typical Hoosier. I am also a gay man, said Jesse Hawk of Fort Wayne. Currently, Indiana is considering an amendment that has me terrified to be a Hoosier.
He said he is worried about his and his partners rights, especially on medical matters.
During the hearing, Chairman Milo Smith, R-Columbus, ordered one opponent removed from the gallery for giving the thumbs-down sign during testimony.
Read the original:
By Abdul-Hakim Shabazz INDIANAPOLIS (Reuters) – Indiana lawmakers on Wednesday took a step closer toward putting a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage before voters in November, potentially bucking a U.S. trend of states, courts and voters making gay nuptials legal. The state House elections committee voted 9-3 along party lines to advance the proposed amendment and a …
Follow this link: